EEO 21- Constructive discharge or forced resignation or retirement

Constructive Discharge

When an employee is forced to resign, retire, or take demotion due to harassment, discrimination, or
retaliation; he or she may be deemed constructively discharged. If proven, he or she is entitled to the
same remedy as if he or she were discharged involuntarily.

The threshold to establish a constructive discharge, however, is higher or more difficult than for
discharge cases.

The following must be established to prove constructive discharge:

The action voluntarily taken by the employee was a product of misinformation or deception on
the part of the Agency; or

Such action was a product of Agency's coercive actions that made working conditions so
difficult or unpleasant that a reasonable person in that employee's position would have felt
compelled to resign, retire, or take demotion.

See Legal Standards for Establishing Constructive Discharge (PDF free download of MSPB AJ
Ribas' Initial Decision).

It is not enough that you felt disgusted. Your health, to cite an extreme but common case, must be
threatened -- due to harassment, discrimination, or retaliation -- so as to have no choice but to quit
or retire (on disability or otherwise on regular retirement). Or the working condition was so
intolerable that you had no choice but to seek demotion elsewhere or else suffer performance
deficiency, career deadlock, etc.. Or, your financial hardship (in the case of retaliatory or
discriminatory demotion or salary cut) was so severe that you had no choice but to quit to find a
better job, etc. Or, to cite yet another common example, due to denied reasonable accommodation,
you could no longer perform the job.

When you have no choice but to resign, the resignation letter should make it clear that the decision
was forced upon you due to the intolerable working condition which in turn was caused by unlawful
harassment, retaliation, denied accommodation, or discrimination (based on race, age, sex,
disability, etc.). See a sample of a resignation letter under constructive discharge.

Also see harassment, and disparate treatment in the terms and conditions of employment.

Forced resignation, retirement, or demotion may be appeal to MSPB by claiming that your separation
was coerced or forced upon you as result of intolerable working condition in such a way that any
reasonable person under your position would have felt no choice but to separate, as you did. For
MSPB appeals involving a constructive discharge claim, the claim of intolerable working condition
must be established first, so as to invoke MSPB jurisdiction. Otherwise, MSPB does not have a
jurisdiction, as you would be deemed separated voluntarily. Only after having established
intolerable working condition and thus a constructive discharge, you can then argue
discrimination/retaliation. See AJ Ribas' Initial Decision rendered for MSPB Western Regional Office
on Sept. 1, 2011. See more on MSPB jurisdiction.

For MSPB appeals involving termination or constructive discharge claims as result of
discrimination/retaliation, such cases are categorized as "mixed cases," meaning they could involve
either EEOC or MSPB but not both. In such cases, you must raise an "affirmative defense" in your
MSPB appeal, claiming that you were terminated or constructively discharged based on your race,
age, sex, disability, or prior EEO activity, etc. If you do not claim discrimination/retaliation as part of
the affirmative defense in your MSPB appeal, MSPB judge would not be interested in hearing about
discrimination/retaliation. See MSPB hearing for more.

Disability discrimination, OWCP, disability retirement and Workers' Comp.

Disclaimer: All information contained in this website is subject to change and update. EEO 21, LLC is not
responsible for any errrors or misrepresentation contained therein.